<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PBCliberal &#187; media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pbcliberal.com/index.php/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pbcliberal.com</link>
	<description>Ravings &#38; musings from a media junky, programmer &#38; new media producer. Twitter: PBCliberal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching the audience or teaching the guest</title>
		<link>http://www.pbcliberal.com/index.php/2008/09/21/teaching-the-audience-or-teaching-the-guest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbcliberal.com/index.php/2008/09/21/teaching-the-audience-or-teaching-the-guest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PBCliberal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbcliberal.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Sarah Palin apologists tried to explain away her hedge to Charlie Gibson&#8217;s &#8220;Bush doctrine&#8221; question on her first major television interview, the talking point went that it was unfair that when a similar &#8220;Bush doctrine&#8221; question was asked during the ABC Democratic debate, it was defined. But Charlie Gibson didn&#8217;t define it when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Sarah Palin apologists tried to explain away her hedge to Charlie Gibson&#8217;s &#8220;Bush doctrine&#8221; question on her first major television interview, the talking point went that it was unfair that when a similar &#8220;Bush doctrine&#8221; question was asked during the ABC Democratic debate, it was defined. But Charlie Gibson didn&#8217;t define it when it was asked of Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>Of course, one was a real-time statement the audience was sure to hear, the other was a raw interview which would be heavily edited for time, and the questions and question definitions would either be eliminated, re-shot, or handled in voice-over.</p>
<p>Today, on Meet the Press, when Tom Brokaw asked Michael Bloomberg about Joe Biden, adding &#8220;vice-presidential candidate with Barack Obama,&#8221; as an appositive, Bloomberg quipped, &#8220;I know who he is.&#8221;</p>
<p>There was a time that interviewing a major political figure, you could assume you could talk in shorthand. They were busy, and would be more than happy to launch into a long explanation at even a pregnant pause.</p>
<p>But Sarah Palin, and more important, her apologists, have moved the goal post. Now, if you don&#8217;t ask the question the same way for the candidates as you do when you&#8217;re trying to teach the audience, you&#8217;re unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbcliberal.com/index.php/2008/09/21/teaching-the-audience-or-teaching-the-guest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

